Case LawHigh Court › Judgt. Dt.4.4.19 In T.c.a.77/2005Marutha...

Judgt. Dt.4.4.19 In T.c.a.77/2005Marutham Finance & Construction v. Acit1/2

High Court 04 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Judgt. Dt.4.4.19 In T.c.a.77/2005Marutham Finance & Construction v. Acit1/2
Date of order
04 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Judgt. Dt.4.4.19 In T.c.a.77/2005Marutham Finance & Construction v. Acit1/2, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: The Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 4.4.2019 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Tax Case Appeal No.77 of 2005 M/s.Marutham Finance & Construction,3/85-C, Arun Nagar,Maruthamalai Road, Vadavalli,Coimbatore.AppellantVs.The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome TaxCompany Circle II(3)Coimbatore.Respondent The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome TaxCompany Circle II(3)Coimbatore. Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 21.9.2004made in ITA No.1456/Mds/2000. For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar PadmanabhanFor Respondent: Mr.T. R.Senthilkumar, Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Ms.K.G.Usha RaniJUDGMENT(Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J) Learned counsel for the Assessee Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present Appeal. 2. Though the case records were to be reconstructed, the learned counsel on both sides produced copies of the order passed by the learned http://www.judis.nic.in 2/2 DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.and C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. ssk. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal alone and the order passed by the Authority below is not readily available with them. However, taking into consideration the copy of the order passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal from which the present Appeal was filed by the Assessee in the year 2005, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the Assessee, we allow the present appeal to be withdrawn by the Assessee. 3. Learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, appearing for the Respondent/Revenue has no objection for the same. The Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Copy of this Judgment may be sent to both Assessee and the Assessing Officer. Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/Nossk. 1. The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome TaxIncome Tax Company Circle lI(3) Coimbatore. 2. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai. Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan