Case LawHigh Court › Jugal Kishore Parwal (Senior Citizen) v....

Jugal Kishore Parwal (Senior Citizen) v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(5), Jaipur

High Court 25 Apr 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Jugal Kishore Parwal (Senior Citizen) v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(5), Jaipur
Date of order
25 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jugal Kishore Parwal (Senior Citizen) v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(5), Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7631/2022 Jugal Kishore Parwal (Senior Citizen), S/o Satya Narain Parwal,Aged About 61 Years, R/o 601, Abhinanadan Apartment,Shashtri Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jaipur-2 HavingIts Office At New Central Revenue Building, Statute Circle,Bhagwan Das Road, C-Schme, Jaipur-302005Its Office At New Central Revenue Building, Statute Circle,Bhagwan Das Road, C-Schme, Jaipur-302005 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(5), Jaipur Having Its Office AtNew Central Revenue Building, Statute Circle, BhagwanDas Road, C-Schme, Jaipur-302005New Central Revenue Building, Statute Circle, BhagwanDas Road, C-Schme, Jaipur-302005 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka For Respondent(s): Mr. Nikhil Simlote HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 25/04/2024 Counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present Civil Writ Petition. The same is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J MAHIMA/137
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan