Case LawHigh Court › Jyoti v. Jani

Jyoti v. Jani

High Court 09 May 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Jyoti v. Jani
Date of order
09 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jyoti v. Jani, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: Revenue is in appeal against the judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30.11.2017 raising following question for our consideration:Appellate Tribunal dated 30.11.2017 raising following question for our consideration: “Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and on facts in upl...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/468/2018 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 468 of 2018 ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3VersusPRAVINKUMAR PARSHOTTAMDAS PITRODA ========================================================== Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA Date : 09/05/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Revenue is in appeal against the judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30.11.2017 raising following question for our consideration:Appellate Tribunal dated 30.11.2017 raising following question for our consideration: “Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and on facts in uploading the decision of the CIT(A) and thereby deleting the addition of Rs. 77,23,834/- made on account of rejection of book result u/s. 145 of the Act and estimation of net profit?” 2. Having perused the documents on record with the assistance of the learned counsel for the Revenue, we find that CIT (A) and the Tribunal concurrently came to a factual finding that there was no occasion for reduction of the assessee's books of account and additions made by the Assessing Officer were therefore not justified.the learned counsel for the Revenue, we find that CIT (A) and the Tribunal concurrently came to a factual finding that there was no occasion for reduction of the assessee's books of account and additions made by the Assessing Officer were therefore not justified. C/TAXAP/468/2018 ORDER 3. No question of law arises. Tax Appeal is dismissed. (AKIL KURESHI, J) JYOTI V. JANI (B.N. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan