In Jyoti v. Jani, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1420 of 2007
With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1090 of 2008With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1265 of 2007With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 128 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1320 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1353 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1462 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1527 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1550 of 2007With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 167 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1702 of 2008With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 177 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 182 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 183 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1844 of 2008With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1845 of 2008With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 18 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1962 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1964 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2455 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 256 of 2009With
C/TAXAP/1420/2007 ORDER
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2669 of 2010With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 330 of 2010With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 62 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 63 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 64 of 2011With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 66 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 678 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 67 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 68 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 723 of 2010With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 769 of 2010With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 76 of 2011With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 77 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 863 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 864 of 2010
==========================================================
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IVersusSUNILKUMAR B HANDA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
C/TAXAP/1420/2007 ORDER
Date : 04/09/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Learned advocate Ms. Mauna Bhatt, under instructions from the department, sought permission to withdraw these appeals since the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by CBDT in its circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court.
Permission is granted. Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
JYOTI V. JANI
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.