Jyoti v. Jani
High Court
17 Sep 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Jyoti v. Jani
Date of order
17 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Jyoti v. Jani, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/1124/2014 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1124 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 109 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1216 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1251 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1385 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 148 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 159 of 2017With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 188 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 189 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 204 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 258 of 2017With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 273 of 2017With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 275 of 2017With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 329 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 330 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 366 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 390 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 391 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 399 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 400 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 435 of 2015
C/TAXAP/1124/2014 ORDER
With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 589 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 630 of 2018With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 673 of 2018With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 692 of 2017With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 696 of 2016With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 781 of 2015
With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 786 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 876 of 2017With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 930 of 2017With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 932 of 2017
With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 989 of 2011
==========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IVersusMAHENDRA SHANTILAL VYAS
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR.VARUN K.PATEL, Mrs. KALPANA RAVAL, MRS MAUNA BHATT for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR RK PATEL, MR B S SOPARKAR, MR MANISH SHAH, MR TUSHAR HEMANI, MR BHAUMIK DHOLARIYA for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 17/09/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Learned advocate for the appellant, under instructions from the department, sought permission to withdraw these appeals since the
tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by CBDT in its circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court.
Permission is granted. Tax Appeals aredisposed of accordingly.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
JYOTI V. JANI
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.