In Jyoti v. Jani, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/SCA/4815/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4815 of 2018
==========================================================MITABEN LALITBHAI DALVADIVersusINCOME TAX OFFICER
==========================================================Appearance:MR SP MAJMUDAR(3456) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 04/04/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition to approach the departmental authorities by making a representation in connection with the action of attachment of the bank account of the petitioner.
Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
JYOTI V. JANI
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue