Case LawHigh Court › Jyoti v. Jani

Jyoti v. Jani

High Court 12 Oct 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Jyoti v. Jani
Date of order
12 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jyoti v. Jani, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: 5.Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11078 of 2022 ========================================================== RENUKABEN UMEDSINH PARMAR VersusINCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ========================================================== Appearance:KRUPABEN S LIMBACHIYA(7851) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MS ANUSHREE PANDEY FOR MRR.CHIRAG B UPADHYAY(6735) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIAand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 12/10/2022 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA) Learned advocate Ms. Anushree Pandey appears on behalf oflearned advocate Mr. Chirag B.Upadhyay for the petitioner to stateand submit that she has both authority and instructions from learnedadvocate on record as well as from the petitioner to appear, argueincluding withdraw the petition. 2.On the basis of such authority and instructions, learnedadvocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the presentpetition. 3.The Permission, as prayed for, is granted. 4.It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of thecase of the subject matter. 5.Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. (N.V.ANJARIA, J) JYOTI V. JANI (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan