K. Mohanakrishnan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle 22(1)
High Court
04 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
K. Mohanakrishnan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle 22(1)
Date of order
04 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In K. Mohanakrishnan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle 22(1), the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: With the above observations, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022and Crl. M.P. Nos.11205 and 11208 of 2022
K. Mohanakrishnan
... Petitioner/Accused
Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle 22(1),No.7, Ramakrishna Street Ist Floor,West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.... Respondent
PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure praying to call for records pertaining to E.O.C.C. No.30 of
2021 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court,
Economic Offence - II, Egmore, Chennai and to quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.M. Deivanandam
For Respondent : Mr.L. Muralikrishnan,
Special Public Prosecutor forIncome Tax
O R D E R
This petition has been filed to quash the complaint in E.O.C.C. No.30 of
Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022
2021 filed for the offence under Section 276 CC of the Income Tax Act.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has now filed a compounding petition before the Commissioner of Income Tax and the same is pending.
3. In view of the said submission, this Court is of the view that the impugned complaint need not be quashed and the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the compounding petition. The learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that direction can be issued to the Commissioner of Income Tax to decide the compounding petition in accordance with law within a time period. Hence, a direction is issued to the Commissioner of Income Tax to consider the compounding application as expeditiously as possible.
4. With the above observations, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
04.03.2025
mjs
To
1. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Economic Offence - II, Egmore, Chennai.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Non Corporate Circle 22(1),
2/4
No.7, Ramakrishna Street Ist Floor,West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
3/4
Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022
SUNDER MOHAN., J.
mjs
Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022
4/4
Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022
04.03.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.