Case LawHigh Court › K. Mohanakrishnan v. The Assistant Commi...

K. Mohanakrishnan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle 22(1)

High Court 04 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
K. Mohanakrishnan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle 22(1)
Date of order
04 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In K. Mohanakrishnan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle 22(1), the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above observations, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.03.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022and Crl. M.P. Nos.11205 and 11208 of 2022 K. Mohanakrishnan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle 22(1),No.7, Ramakrishna Street Ist Floor,West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.... Respondent PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for records pertaining to E.O.C.C. No.30 of 2021 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Economic Offence - II, Egmore, Chennai and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M. Deivanandam For Respondent : Mr.L. Muralikrishnan, Special Public Prosecutor forIncome Tax O R D E R This petition has been filed to quash the complaint in E.O.C.C. No.30 of Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022 2021 filed for the offence under Section 276 CC of the Income Tax Act. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has now filed a compounding petition before the Commissioner of Income Tax and the same is pending. 3. In view of the said submission, this Court is of the view that the impugned complaint need not be quashed and the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the compounding petition. The learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that direction can be issued to the Commissioner of Income Tax to decide the compounding petition in accordance with law within a time period. Hence, a direction is issued to the Commissioner of Income Tax to consider the compounding application as expeditiously as possible. 4. With the above observations, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 04.03.2025 mjs To 1. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Economic Offence - II, Egmore, Chennai. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle 22(1), 2/4 No.7, Ramakrishna Street Ist Floor,West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3/4 Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022 SUNDER MOHAN., J. mjs Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022 4/4 Crl. O.P. No.17792 of 2022 04.03.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan