Case LawHigh Court › Kailashchandra Suryakant Huf v. Income T...

Kailashchandra Suryakant Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2)(1), Ahmedabad

High Court 22 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Kailashchandra Suryakant Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2)(1), Ahmedabad
Date of order
22 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Kailashchandra Suryakant Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2)(1), Ahmedabad, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5612 of 2022 ==========================================================KAILASHCHANDRA SURYAKANT HUF Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD ==========================================================Appearance:MR. HARDIK V VORA(7123) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE Date : 22/03/2022 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) Mr. Hardik Vora, the learned counsel appearing for the writ-applicant does not to press this writ-application any further andseeks permission to withdraw the same. Permission as prayed for is granted. This writ-application isdisposed of as not pressed without expressing any opinion on themerits of the case. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) A. B. VAGHELA (NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan