Kaka Singh @ Paramyjit Singh And Another v. Income Tax Commissioner And Another
High Court
18 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Kaka Singh @ Paramyjit Singh And Another v. Income Tax Commissioner And Another
Date of order
18 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Kaka Singh @ Paramyjit Singh And Another v. Income Tax Commissioner And Another, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARHCWP-32 366-201Decided on: 18.12.2018
Kaka Singh @ Paramyjit Singh and another
Versus
Income Tax Commissioner and another
... Petitioners
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL,
Present:Mr. Rohan Sharma, Advocatefor the petitioners,
FE 8 FSR
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL_J (ORAL)
The petitioners have approached this Court by filing writpetition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India impugningnotice under Section 142(1) of Income Tax Act 1961 issued byrespondent No.2 for the assessment year 2011-12.
2 At present, no order adverse to the petitioners has beenpassed which may give cause of grievance to file the present writpetition. The petitioners have the remedies to appear before theAssessing Officer and raise all the pleas as sought to be raised herein.
3,It is clarified that in case any order adverse to thepetitioners is passed by the Assessing Officer, it shall be open for thepetitioners to take recourse to remedies to challenge the same inaccordance with law.
4In such circumstances, we do not find any justification toentertain the present writ petition at this stage and the same is herebydismissed.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) |JUDGE)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.