Kalaimaghal Sabha Rep By Joint Receiver Mr.s.navaneethakrishnan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Salem-7
High Court
30 Sep 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Kalaimaghal Sabha Rep By Joint Receiver Mr.s.navaneethakrishnan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Salem-7
Date of order
30 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Kalaimaghal Sabha Rep By Joint Receiver Mr.s.navaneethakrishnan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Salem-7, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence,the writ petition is dismissed for default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
KALAIMAGHAL SABHA REP BY JOINT RECEIVER MR.S.NAVANEETHAKRISHNAN
[ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) SALEM-7
2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD II (L) SALEM(7)
3 THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER II
3 GANDHI ROAD , SALEM 636 007
4 THE BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA KOMARAPALAYAM
5 THE BRANCH MANAGER
KARUR VYSIA BANK LTD.
KOMARAPALAYAM
[ RESPONDENTS ]
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the entirerecords from the 3rd respondent in connection with his impugnedproceedings dated 22.8.2003 and quash the same and consequentlyforbear the respondents from in any way interfering with the rightsof the petitioners in administering the Sabha as per the orders ofthis Court dated 30.3.99 and 30.4.1999 made in W.P.No.514/1999 and tobring the properties of the petitioner Sabha to auction.
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 16.09.2015, there wasno representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter wasdirected to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on23.09.2015. Though the matter is listed under the caption "for
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
dismissal", there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence,the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Connectedmiscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (J)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
rg
To
1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) SALEM-7
2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD II (L) SALEM(7)
3 THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER II
3 GANDHI ROAD , SALEM 636 007
4 THE BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA KOMARAPALAYAM
5 THE BRANCH MANAGER
KARUR VYSIA BANK LTD. KOMARAPALAYAM
+1 cc to Mr.T.Pramodkumar Chopda, Advocate, sr.53148+1 cc to Mr.R.T.Doraisamy, Advocate, sr.53518
W.P.No.24502 of 2003
ad co
kra 13/10
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue