In Kalawati Since Deceased Through Lr Rakesh Kumar v. Income Tax Officer Hq And Anr, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Her submission is place on record, In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CWP? No. 12016 of 202
aa
223IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CWP? No. 12016 of 2020
Date of Decision°14.190.202
Kalawati since deceased through LR Rakesh Kumar
—____ Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer HQ and anr
.... Respondents
CORAMHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANACORAM:HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate withMr. M.S. Kanda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tajender Joshi, Advocate|for the respondents.
FS FS 2
SN. SATYANARAYANAI_J.(Oral)
Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner would submitthat pursuant to the order of this Court dated 23.09.2020, thecompetent authority officiating on behalf of Principal Commissionerof Income Tax has passed appropriate order by looking into thecircular dated 22.04.2020 in that view of the matter the present writpetition has rendered infructuous. Her submission is place on record,
In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed
of as having become infructuous.
IS.N. SATYANARAYANA]JUDGEJARCHANA PURI]JUDGE
October 14, 2020
rashmi
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether reportable?
yes/noyes/no
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue