Kalindi Investments Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
06 Apr 1999 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Kalindi Investments Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Apr 1999
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Kalindi Investments Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (1999) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- KALINDI INVESTMENTS PVT.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 262 of 1984
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
KALINDI INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR KC PATEL for Petitioner
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 06/04/99
ORAL JUDGEMENT
. At the instance of assessee following question of law arising out of its appellate order in ITA No. 1347 to 1351 of 1982 relating to assessment years 1965-66 to 1969-70, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench C has referred the following question of law for
the opinion of this Court:
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances
ofthe case, the Development Rebate originally
granted was properly withdrawn?"
. When the matter came up for hearing it has been stated by learned counsel for the assessee that in assessee's own case this court in Kalindi Investments (P) Ltd. vs. CIT 213 ITR 207, the aforesaid question has been answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue. Following the aforesaid decision, the above question is also answered affirmatively in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
�There shall be no order as to costs.
���(Rajesh Balia, J) (A.R.Dave, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.