In Kalpanaben Ramakant Patel v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Without expressingany opinion on merits, much less going into the merits of the case of theassessee, the petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5175 of 2022
==========================================================
KALPANABEN RAMAKANT PATEL Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KETAN H SHAH(2705) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIAand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 28/06/2022 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. Ketan H. Shah for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the present petition stating that order underSection 147 read with Section 144B is already passed against thepetitioner-assessee and that the petitioner-assessee has already preferredappeal before the Appellate Authority challenging the said order.
Permission is granted to withdraw the petition. Without expressingany opinion on merits, much less going into the merits of the case of theassessee, the petition is disposed of accordingly.
(N.V.ANJARIA, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.