Kalpna Lodha v. Himanshu Gupta, The Director, Elementary Education,Bikaner.bikaner
High Court
19 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Kalpna Lodha v. Himanshu Gupta, The Director, Elementary Education,Bikaner.bikaner
Date of order
19 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Kalpna Lodha v. Himanshu Gupta, The Director, Elementary Education,Bikaner.bikaner, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 202/2020
in
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1489/2019
Kalpna Lodha, R/o Income Tax Ke Pas, Barmer, District Barmer,Rajasthan. Gps Jasai, Panchayat Samiti Barmer, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Himanshu Gupta, The Director, Elementary Education,Bikaner.Bikaner.
2. Moola Ram Ji Beran, District Education Officer, ElementaryEducation, Barmer.Education, Barmer.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, DepartmentOf Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,Rajasthan.Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Tanwar Singh Rathore
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
19/09/2023
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the present contempt petition, as due compliance of theorder under consideration has been made.
2.Permission granted, as notices have not yet been issued.
3.The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.