Case LawHigh Court › Kamal Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd v...

Kamal Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer-16(1)(2) And Others

High Court 02 May 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Kamal Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer-16(1)(2) And Others
Date of order
02 May 2013
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Kamal Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer-16(1)(2) And Others, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: The Petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO.971 OF 2013 Kamal Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.versusThe Income Tax Officer-16(1)(2)and others ..Petitioner. ..Respondents. ..... Mr. Jehangir D. Mistri, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner.Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANDA.A. SAYED, JJ. 2 May 2013. P.C. : Following an order of assessment dated 21 March 2013 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 a notice of demand was issued to the Petitioner on the same day under which there is a demand in the amount of Rs.4,51,02,360/-for Assessment Year 2010-11. An attachment was levied under Section 281-B on 20 March 2013 in the total amount of Rs.4.51 Crores on the fixed deposits maintained by the Petitioner with Saraswat Co-operative Bank Limited and Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Limited. The Petitioner had filed a stay application which was initially rejected by the AO on 4 April 2013. On 12 April 2013 the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 16(1) declined to accede to an application for stay filed on 9 April 2013. In the affidavit in reply it has been stated that the application for stay which has been filed with the CIT-16, Mumbai has not been disposed of as yet. In the circumstances, counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that the application for stay shall be disposed of by the CIT-16 within a period of two weeks from today on the Petitioner appearing before the officer on 6 May 2013. We record the assurance and direct that in the meantime the attachment that had been levied under Section 281-B shall continue to remain in operation subject to such final orders as may be passed on the application for stay and for a period of four weeks thereafter. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan