Case LawHigh Court › Kanchan India Ltd., 19 v. The Dy. Commis...

Kanchan India Ltd., 19 v. The Dy. Commissioner, Circle, Income Tax Department, Central Office, Ajmer (Raj

High Court 14 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Kanchan India Ltd., 19 v. The Dy. Commissioner, Circle, Income Tax Department, Central Office, Ajmer (Raj
Date of order
14 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Kanchan India Ltd., 19 v. The Dy. Commissioner, Circle, Income Tax Department, Central Office, Ajmer (Raj, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2051 / 2018 Kanchan India Ltd., 19-20, Bhilwara Textile Market, Pur Road, Bhilwara (Raj.) Through Director Jayesh Banger ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Dy. Commissioner, Circle, Income Tax Department, Central Office, Ajmer (Raj.); 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), I.e. CIT (Appeals), Udaipur-2, Udaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Johari _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Order 14/02/2018 It is not disputed that the appeal against the order dated18/12/2017 is still pending before the respondent No.2. In spite ofthe same, the present writ petition has been filed seeking releaseof the bank account which has since been attached withoutapproaching the concerned authority for the said interim relief aswell as without any order having been passed rejecting the saidrelief. Dismissed accordingly. (NIRMALJIT KAUR),J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan