Kanika Singhal v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Cuircle-L,Jalandhar And Others
High Court
26 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Kanika Singhal v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Cuircle-L,Jalandhar And Others
Date of order
26 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kanika Singhal v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Cuircle-L,Jalandhar And Others, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CW P-23246-202Date of decision: 26.11.2021
Kanika Singhal
Petitioner
Versus
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Cuircle-l,Jalandhar and others..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present:Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocatefor the petitioner.
(Through Video Conferencing)
TS FE FS
AJAY TEWARI, J (QRAL)
This is a petition for return ofjewellary and cash which was|seized during the search operation on the ground that the petitioner haspaid all the tax liability and nothing is due from her to the Income Tax. ©
Learned counsel states that in connection, the petitioner hasmade application on 22.02.2021 (Annexure P-9) to respondent No.6 andalso on 03.06.2021 (Annexure P-10) to respondent No.4, but no orderhas been passed thereon. She further states that she would be satisfied atthis stage, if a direction is given to respondent No.4 to decide the saidapplication by passing a speaking order thereon within a period of threeweeks. Consequently, we dispose of this writ petition directingrespondent No.4 to decide the said application by passing a speakingorder thereon within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt ofcertified copy of this order.
CW P-23246-202
Since the main case has been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of,
(AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE
26.1127021Dinesh
(PANKAJ JAIN )JUDGE _
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable :
YesNo
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.