Case LawHigh Court › Kannan Anandhababu v. The Income Tax Off...

Kannan Anandhababu v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(2), Tirupur

High Court 22 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Kannan Anandhababu v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(2), Tirupur
Date of order
22 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Kannan Anandhababu v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(2), Tirupur, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.25098 of 2025 W.M.P.Nos.28279 & 28281 of 2025 Kannan Anandhababu ... Petitioner Vs. The Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(2), Tirupur. ... Respondent Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue a Writ of Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Assessment Order passed by the respondent in Order No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1062066759(1) dated 06.03.2024 and quash the same as illegal and allow the petitioner to file the Income Tax Return for the particular assessment year. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Selvakumar For Respondent : M/s.M.Sheela Senior Standing Counsel ORDER 1/4 W.P.No.25098 of 2025 The petitioner is before this Court challenging the impugned Assessment Order dated 06.03.2024 passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Although the petitioner has raised several grounds against the impugned Assessment Order dated 06.03.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be satisfied if a liberty is given to the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the Appellate Commissioner. 3. Considering the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is given liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Appellate Commissioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If such an appeal is filed within such time, the Appellate Commissioner shall dispose of the same on merits. 4. Considering the fact that dispute pertains to the assessment year 2018- 19, the Appellate Commissioner may endeavour to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible. 5. It is open to the petitioner to file appropriate application under Section W.P.No.25098 of 2025 220 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the respondent for staying of the recovery proceedings. 6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. raja 22.09.2025 Neutral Citation : Yes / No To The Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(2), Tirupur. C.SARAVANAN, J. raja 3/4 4/4 W.P.No.25098 of 2025 W.P.No.25098 of 2025 22.09.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan