Case LawHigh Court › Kannan v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward

Kannan v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward

High Court 25 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Kannan v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
25 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Kannan v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above said direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 25.02.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.6508 of 2025 Kannan,S/o. Kunankani,89, 3[rd] Street, Srivenkateswara Nagar,Mottukuppam Road, Maduravoyal,Tiruvallur 600 095.... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Income Tax Officer (HQ) (PR), Office of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income tax, Tamilnadu & Puducherry Region, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai 600 0034. Office of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income tax, Tamilnadu & Puducherry Region, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai 600 0034. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Christo Building, II Floor, State Bank Road, Ootacamund – 643 001. ... Respondent Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to refund the sum of Rs.2,09,489/- paid by the petitioner towards the tax for the assessment year 2015-16 on 15.04.2015 as per the Form No.16 in view of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.18566, 18788, 18608 to 18610, 1/6 W.P.No.6508 of 2025 18789 of 2015 dated 17.03.2017 and also for a direction to pay interest for the delay in refunding the above sum to the petitioner within a time limit. For Petitioner : Mr.J.NagarajanFor Respondent: Dr.B.RamaswamyFor Respondent: Dr.B.Ramaswamy : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the second respondent to refund the sum of Rs.2,09,489/- paid by the petitioner towards the tax for the assessment year 2015-16 on 15.04.2015 as per the Form No.16 in view of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.18566, 18788, 18608 to 18610, 18789 of 2015 dated 17.03.2017 and also for a direction to pay interest for the delay in refunding the above sum to the petitioner within a time limit. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the official respondents and perused the materials available on record. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner made a request for grant of refund of tax before the 1[st] respondent vide 2/6 W.P.No.6508 of 2025 representation dated 22.07.2024. The 1[st] respondent had forwarded the petitioner's representations to the 2[nd] respondent with a direction to take necessary action on the said representation. Since the 2[nd] respondent has not considered the petitioner's representations so far, the petitioner is constrained to file the present writ petition. 4.The learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner may submit his representation afresh before the 2[nd] respondent and the 2[nd] respondent will forward the said representation to the concerned Authorities, so as to address the grievance of the petitioner. 5.Considering the submission made by both the parties and in view of the limited prayer sought for in this Writ Petition, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to file their representation afresh before the 2[nd] respondent and on such representation, this Court directs the 2[nd] respondent to forward the same to the concerned Authorities. Thereafter, the Authorities concerned shall consider the petitioner's representation within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the 3/6 representation. 6. With the above said direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. . rst 25.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-Speaking Order To: 1.The Income Tax Officer (HQ) (PR), Office of the Principal Chief Office of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income tax, Tamilnadu & Puducherry Region, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai 600 0034. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Christo Building, Ward-1, Christo Building, II Floor, State Bank Road, Ootacamund – 643 001. 4/6 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/6 representation. 6. With the above said direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. . rst 25.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-Speaking Order To: 1.The Income Tax Officer (HQ) (PR), Office of the Principal Chief Office of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income tax, Tamilnadu & Puducherry Region, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai 600 0034. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Christo Building, Ward-1, Christo Building, II Floor, State Bank Road, Ootacamund – 643 001. 4/6 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6508 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6508 of 2025 rst W.P.No.6508 of 2025 25.02.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan