Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, Vidyalaya Marg, Tanda Road, Jalandhar v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rishi Nagar Ludhiana
High Court
22 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, Vidyalaya Marg, Tanda Road, Jalandhar v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rishi Nagar Ludhiana
Date of order
22 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, Vidyalaya Marg, Tanda Road, Jalandhar v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rishi Nagar Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is, accordingly, disposed of, ( SJ.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CWP? No21145 of 2011Date of Decision : 22.09.2016
Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, Vidyalaya Marg, Tanda Road, Jalandhar
Versus
_... Petitioner
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Rishi Nagar Ludhiana
...... Respondent
CORAM °:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
...
Present :Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocatefor the petitioner.
Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior Standing Counselfor the respondent.
...
S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that
the petitioner has been granted exemption under Section 10(23C) (iliab) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961.
The petitioner's grievance is, therefore, stands redressed.
The petition is, accordingly, disposed of,
( SJ. VAZIFDAR )
CHIEF JUSTICE
September 22, 2016
jt
( DEEPAK SIBAL )
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue