Case LawHigh Court › Kapil Baheti v. Income Tax Officer, Ward...

Kapil Baheti v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara

High Court 05 Sep 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Kapil Baheti v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara
Date of order
05 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Kapil Baheti v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of as having becomeinfructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3118/2023 Kapil Baheti S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Baheti, Aged About 35Years, Having His Address At 1, Station Road Gulabpura,Bhilwara 331021. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara Having Its AddressAt Near Kawa Khera Chourha, Shashtri Nagar, Bhilwara.At Near Kawa Khera Chourha, Shashtri Nagar, Bhilwara. 2. The National Faceless Assessment Centre, Having ItsAddress At Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Finance,Inside Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi.Address At Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Finance,Inside Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s): Mr. Siddharth RankaFor Respondent(s): Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s): Mr. K.K. Bissa HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 05/09/2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the presentwrit petition has been rendered infructuous as the finalassessment order has been passed. The writ petition stands disposed of as having becomeinfructuous. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH),CJ 1-MohitTak/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan