Case LawHigh Court › Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissio...

Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others

High Court 25 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jammuhc
Parties
Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others
Date of order
25 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CJ Court Case: OWP No. 231 of 2013 Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills .....Appellant/Petitioner(s) v/s Through :-Sh. Sachin Sharma, Advocate vice Sh. Subash Dutt, Advocate. Commissioner of Income Tax and others .....Respondent(s) Through :-Sh. KDS Kotwal, Advocate vice Smt. Aruna Thakur, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. AKRAM CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER Basically the petitioner by means of this writ petition wants refund for the Assessment Year 1998-99. Sh. KDS Kotwal, learned counsel appearing vice Smt. Aruna Thakur, advocate submits that the writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as the refund for the Assessment Year 1998-99 has already been made. Counsel for the petitioner has verified and has instruction to state that as stated by Sh. Kotwal, the refund has already been received by the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the purpose of filing the writ petition stands achieved and no further cause of action survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (MOHD. AKRAM CHOWDHARY) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan