Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others
High Court
25 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jammuhc
Parties
Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others
Date of order
25 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: OWP No. 231 of 2013
Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills
.....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
v/s
Through :-Sh. Sachin Sharma, Advocate vice Sh. Subash Dutt, Advocate.
Commissioner of Income Tax and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :-Sh. KDS Kotwal, Advocate vice Smt. Aruna Thakur, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. AKRAM CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER
Basically the petitioner by means of this writ petition wants refund for
the Assessment Year 1998-99.
Sh. KDS Kotwal, learned counsel appearing vice Smt. Aruna Thakur, advocate submits that the writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as the refund for the Assessment Year 1998-99 has already been made.
Counsel for the petitioner has verified and has instruction to state that as stated by Sh. Kotwal, the refund has already been received by the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the purpose of filing the writ petition stands achieved and no further cause of action survives for adjudication.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(MOHD. AKRAM CHOWDHARY) (PANKAJ MITHAL)
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.