Case LawHigh Court › Kaushal Textiles v. Commissioner Of Inco...

Kaushal Textiles v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 28 Jun 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Kaushal Textiles v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
28 Jun 2001
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Kaushal Textiles v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ KAUSHAL TEXTILES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RK PATEL WITH MR.B.D.KARIA for Applicant.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 166 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: ���� Sd/-� Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ KAUSHAL TEXTILES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RK PATEL WITH MR.B.D.KARIA for Applicant. MR BB NAYAK FOR MR. MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 28/06/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE) 1�Learned Advocate Shri R.K.Patel has appeared for the applicant-assessee and learned Advocate Shri B.B.Nayak has appeared for the Revenue. the applicant-assessee and learned Advocate Shri 2�At the time of hearing of the Reference it has been submitted by the learned Advocate for the assessee that he has received instruction for withdrawal of this Reference, and therefore, he has prayed for withdrawal of the Reference. Permission granted. 3�In view of the above fact we decline to answer the question and the Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. the question and the Reference stands disposed of ����Sd/-��Sd/- ���(A.R.Dave, J)�(D.A.Mehta, J) m.m.bhatt
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan