Kaushik v. Chedda
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Kaushik v. Chedda
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Kaushik v. Chedda, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4155 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1720 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax-22..Appellant Navi Mumbai
Kaushik V. Chedda..Respondent Proprietor M/s.Jain Sugar Co.
Mr.R.K.Sharma with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, forAppellant None for Respondent
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008
P.C.
.This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 389 days in filing of the main appeal.Perusal of the affidavit in support indicates thatthe file was sent to the Ministry of Law fordrafting an appeal memo on 1[st] December, 2004 andthe draft was received on 15[th] June, 2005. A period
of more than six months for drafting the appealcannot be said to be reasonable cause and the causeshown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence,the Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue