Kawalpreet Singh v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 58 (1), Delhi & Anr
High Court
09 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Kawalpreet Singh v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 58 (1), Delhi & Anr
Date of order
09 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kawalpreet Singh v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 58 (1), Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~5
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 12633/2024
KAWALPREET SINGH
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 58 (1), DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC along with Ms. Naincy Jain and Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSCs for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
CM APPL. 76671/2024 (under Section 15 1 of CPCfor urgent hearing)
1.This is an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the Petitioner seeking stay of the show-cause notice dated 23.12.2024 (‘SCN’) issued by the Respondents.
2.Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the reply to SCN will be filed on or before 31.12.2024. He, however, prays that so as not to render the Review Petition No. 434/2024 infructuous, the Respondents may be directed to defer passing of the final order.
3.Mr. Shlok Chandra, learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 accepts notice.
4.In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Respondents are directed to defer passing of the final orders until 24.01.2025, i.e., the date already fixed for hearing before this Court.
5.Petitioner shall ensure that its reply is filed on or before 31.12.2024.
6.The application stands disposed of.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA (VACATION JUDGE)
DECEMBER 30, 2024/bh/MG
SAURABH BANERJEE (VACATION JUDGE)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.