Case Law › High Court › K.chinnaraj Naidu v. The Assistant Commi...

K.chinnaraj Naidu v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle –

High Court 03 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
K.chinnaraj Naidu v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle –
Date of order
03 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In K.chinnaraj Naidu v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle –, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.11.2014 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPALW.P(MD)No.17675 of 2014 K.CHINNARAJ NAIDU.. Petitioner Vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE – 1, VIRUDHUNAGAR... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing therespondent to revise the petitioner's income tax assessment inrespect of the assessment year 2007-2008 and to refund the excesstax collected from the petitioner by considering the petitioner'srepresentation dated 17.01.2013 within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.P.SrinivasFor Respondent: Mrs.S.Srimathy O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. According to the Petitioner, he had submitted arepresentation dated 17.01.2013 addressed to the respondentseeking to revise his assessment for the assessment year 2007-2008 and to refund the excess tax collected from him. Till date,there appears to be an inaction on the part of the respondent.According to the petitioner, his representation has not seen theresult in a positive manner. 3. In view of the fact that the relief sought for by thepetitioner in his representation dated 17.01.2013 is only limitedin nature, this Court without adverting to the merits anddemerits of the contents of representation made by the petitionerin his representation dated 17.01.2013, in the interest ofhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/justice and fair play, directs the respondent to look into therepresentation of the petitioner dated 17.01.2013 with care, caution and circumspection and to dispose of the same one way orother on merits within a period of eight weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that therespondent shall look into the representation of the petitionerdated 17.01.2013 in a fair, just and dispassionate manner and topass a complete and comprehensive order in this matter withoutbeing influenced by the order made in this writ petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the Writ Petition isdisposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Writs) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 1, VIRUDHUNAGAR. +1cc to Mr. P. Srinivas, Advocate in SR.No. 59284+1cc to Mr. S.M.S. Johnny Basha, Advocate in SR.No. 58969 rj2SSB/11.11.2014/2P-4C W.P.(MD)No.17675 of 2014 03.11.2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan