Kebra Extrusion Technik Ltd v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii
High Court
18 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Kebra Extrusion Technik Ltd v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii
Date of order
18 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Kebra Extrusion Technik Ltd v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is disposed of in these terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.45 OF 2009
Kebra Extrusion Technik Ltd.... Appellant.
Vs.
Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax-VIII.
...Respondent.
.....
Mr.Atul K.Jasani for the Appellant.Mr. J.S.Saluja for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
18[th] January, 2010.
P.C.:
The appeal was admitted on the following substantial
question of law :
“Whether the Tribunal ought to have held that written down value for the purpose of depreciation has to be based on depreciation actually allowed to the Appellant in the earlier years and not on the basis of depreciation which was allowable but not claimed and hence not allowed int he earlier years?”
Before the Tribunal, the Revenue has relied upon the
judgment of the Tribunal in Vahid Papers Converters vs. ITO,
(2006) 98 ITD 165. The Tribunal has followed the judgment of
this Court at the Goa Bench in Scoop Industries P.Ltd. vs. ITO, 289 ITR 195. The Tribunal has not considered the merits of the case. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Assessee had submitted that it would be appropriate for this Court to remand the case to the Tribunal for a decision on merits. This is not opposed by Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue. In the circumstances, the judgment of the Tribunal dated 19[th] August 2008 is set aside to that extent and the proceedings are remanded back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on merits. In that view of the matter, it is not necessary for this Court to express a view one way or the other, on the merits of the rival contentions. The appeal is disposed of in these terms. There shall be no order as to costs.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.