In Kendriya Rajaswas Bhavan v. M/S.arvind Advertising & Selling, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: In the light of that there is no merit in this Appeal, which is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.541 OF 2004
Kendriya Rajaswas Bhavan....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Arvind Advertising & Selling
Agencies Pvt. Ltd..Respondents
Mrs. P.P. Bhosale with Mr. B.M,. Chatterjee
and Mr. Parag Vyas i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for
the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 23RD JULY,2007
. The question of law as urged was as under:-
"1. Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law the
Hon’ble Tribunal was justified in dismissing
the Revenue’s Appeal and upholding the order
of CIT (A) confirming the penalty of
Rs.7,15,790/- levied by the Assessing
Officer under Section 271(1)(c)?
2. On behalf of the Appellant learned Counsel
states that the issue is covered by the judgment
reported in 289 ITR 83 against the Department and in
favour of the Assessee. In the light of that there
is no merit in this Appeal, which is accordingly
disposed of.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.