Case Law › Supreme Court › [1996] 1 S.C.R. 365

Kerala Financial Corporation Etc v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kerala

Supreme Court [1996] 1 S.C.R. 365 11 Jan 1996 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
Supreme Court
Parties
Kerala Financial Corporation Etc v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kerala
Date of order
11 Jan 1996
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other

Case analysis

⚙️ Auto-generated structured summary from the order — a quick research aid, not a hand-reviewed analysis. Read the original judgment below for authority.
In Kerala Financial Corporation Etc v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kerala, the Supreme Court (1996) decided the matter.

Original judgment (source document)

The analysis above is EaseValue's editorial summary. Below is the court's original order, reproduced from the public record as a source document — the OCR text is cleaned for readability but may retain scanning artifacts; rely on the official source for the authentic version.
▸ Show the full original order (source text)
KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION ETC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA JANUARY 11, 1996 [KULDIP SINGH AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.) Income-tax Act, 1961 : Bad debts-Observation regarding refund of tax made in the main judgment at paras 9 to I 5 deleted-On the advances being written off steps c ' could be taken by the assessee in accordance with the relevant provisions relating to bad debts. State Bank of Travancore v. Commissioner of Income Tax, [1986) 2 SCC 11=158 ITR 102, referred to and· explained. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : I.A. Nos. I to 6. Civil Appeal Nos. 4636 to 4641 of 1994. E From the Judgment and Order dated 24.10.84 of the Kerala High Court in l.T.R. C. Nos. 279 and 280 of 1979. J. Ramamurthy, B.B. Ahuja, R. Satish and B.K. Prasad for the Appel-lants. F P.S. Poti and N. Sudhakaran for the Respondent. The Order of the Court was delivered by HANSARIA, J. 366 SCPREME COURT REPORTS I S.C.R. A stand has been taken because what the majority had held in the aforesaid case was that in cases of 'sticky advances' what could really be done is that on the assessee writing off the advances, the same would become bad debt and could be so dealt by the assessee as permitted by the relevant section of the Income Tax Act. In aforesaid paras, however, it came to be stated that on the advances B become bad debts, refund of tax paid on the interest could be claimed by the assessee in accordance with law. It is apparent that the majority in State Bank of Travancore had not said so. This is not disputed by Shri Poli who had appeared for the appellants. It is accordingly stated that the observation made relating to refund of C tax in the aforesaid paragraphs of the judgment would stand deleted. Instead, we state on the advances being written off, steps could be taken by the assessee in accordance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act reiatable to bad debts. The applications are disposed of with these observations. G.N. Applications are disposed of.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan