Kesharchand Gulabchand Munot v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Others
High Court
18 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Kesharchand Gulabchand Munot v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Others
Date of order
18 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Kesharchand Gulabchand Munot v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Others, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.In light of that, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1620 OF 2005.
Kesharchand Gulabchand Munot Vs. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and others.
Court's or Judge's orders
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions andRegistrar's orders.
Mr.L.B.Pallod, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Alok Sharma, Standing counsel for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND
A.M.BADAR,JJ.
Date : 18.01.2016.
PER COURT :
1.Heard.
2.On 7.7.2015, the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. To accommodate him, the matter was adjourned. The matter was also called on 4.1.2016, the counsel for the petitioner was absent. However, in the interest of justice it was adjourned to 18.1.2016. Today also, when the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner.
3.In light of that, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
(A.M.BADAR,J.)(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.18.01.2016. asp/office/wp1620.05
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue