Case Law › High Court › Ketan Tirodkar v. Income Tax Via Commiss...

Ketan Tirodkar v. Income Tax Via Commissioner Ors

High Court 04 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

04 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ketan Tirodkar v. Income Tax Via Commissioner Ors, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL PIL NO. 35 OF 2014 Ketan Tirodkar Vs. Income Tax Via Commissioner Ors ..Petitioner ..Respondents None for the PetitionerMr. Anil C Singh ASG i/b Mr. Tajveer Singh for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2Mrs. P. P. Shinde APP for the Respondent No.3 P.C. CORAM :R. M. SAVANT, & SMT. SADHANA S JADHAV JJ DATE : 4[th] JULY, 2017 1 1The above Criminal PIL was on board on 19-1-2017 when none had appeared for the Petitioner. Today also none appears for the Petitioner. The Criminal PIL is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution. [SMT SADHANA S. JADHAV, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.