Keystone Realtors Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax- Central Circle 2(4) And Ors
High Court
28 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Keystone Realtors Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax- Central Circle 2(4) And Ors
Date of order
28 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Keystone Realtors Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax- Central Circle 2(4) And Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayedfor.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byMANOJ RMANOJ RTANDALETANDALEDate:2022.01.2917:29:10+0530
Tandle
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3541 OF 2019
Keystone Realtors Private Limited
… Petitioner.
Versus
Assistant Commissioner OfIncome Tax- Central Circle 2(4) And Ors.
… Respondents.
. . . . . .
Mr. Percy J. Pardiwalla, Sr. Advocate a/w Mr. Dharan V. Gandhi & Mr. Harsh M. Kapadia for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
. . . . . .
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM AND
N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE : 28[th] JANUARY, 2022
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
P. C.:
1.After the petition was heard for some time, Mr. Pardiwalla,Senior Advocate, on instructions, sought leave of the Court to withdrawthe Petition with liberty to raise all points before the appropriateAuthority.
2.Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayedfor.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.