Khammam v. Prasad (Sc For Income Tax)The Court Made The Following: Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR-T'HE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M,S.RAMACHANDRA RAOrHE HoNouRABLE sRllfsflcE r,vrNoD KUMAR tNcoME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEALNO:502OF 2011 rncome Tax Tribunar Appear Under Section 260 0f the rncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the rncome Tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad ,B, Bench, Hyderabad inthe order of the rncome Tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad ,B, Bench, Hyderabad inlrA.No"l261lHl20o3 for Assessment year 2000-2001 dated 31 .03.20i.r preferredagainst the order of the commissioner of rncome Tax Appears Vijyawada, AppearNo 0114/Kmm/crr(A)A//03-04 dated against the order of the commissioner of rncome Tax Appears Vijyawada, AppearNo 0114/Kmm/crr(A)A//03-04 dated 24.09.2003 preferred against the order of theAdditional commissioner of rncome Tax, Khammam Range, pAN/GrR No.T-101dated 21.03.2003.Between:dated 21.03.2003.Between: IVis. The Singareni coilieries company Limited, A pubric Limited company.rncorporated under the Rep. by its oiairman ano tr,tanaging 6ir;i;;.-Fr;isio'ns ofcompanies Aci, 19s6, Havin! its Registered oniie-ii kotnugi,ll;"diii"ri"r,Kothagudem-507 1 0 1 Khamma-m District- ..,APPELLANT AND 1 . Commissioner of lncome Tax, Vijayawada. 2. Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle .1 , Khammam. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. K. VIVEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI.J. V. PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE [M'S'RAMACTIANDRA ] AND THE [T' VINOD ] I.T[T.][A.][ No.][50][2of][2011] : (Per [Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][M'S][ Ramachandra Rao)] G Leamed [counsel ][for ][the ][aPPellant][ filed ][a ][letter ][dt'29-04-2021] before [the ][Registrar ][(Judicial), ][High ][court ][of ][relangana, ][Hyderabad]seeking [to ][withdraw ][this ][Appeal ][stating that ][the ][dispute ][between the]appellant [and ][the ][respondent ][has beerl settled ][through ][Direct ][Tax]Vivad [Se ][Vishwas ][Scheme' 2020 ][of ][the ][Central Govemment'] Recording [the ][same, ][this ][Appeal is ][dismissed ][as ][withCrawn' ][No] costs. As a [sequel, miscelianeous ][petitions pending' ][if ][any' ][in ][this] Appeal [shali ][stand ][closed'] Sd/. K.SRINIVAS JOINT 6,SECTION ,TRUE [COPY'] To, 1. The [lncome Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad 'B' ][Bench' ][Hyderabad'] 2. One [to ][Sri' ][K. ][Vivek Reddy' Advocate ] 3. one [to Sri. ][J. ][V. ][Prasad (SC ][FoR ][INCOME TAX), Advocate ][[oPUC]] 4. Two [CD CoPies] gbr \ }-. HIGH DATED: [3010412021] JUDGMENT ITTA,No.502 of 20'11 DISMISING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWN @ *d* 1\-lEIAIAqd 0I [iui'i2021]C'}\),-\. \'[:v]