Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-9,Pune And Another
High Court
20 Feb 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-9,Pune And Another
Date of order
20 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-9,Pune And Another, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 of 2 WP.1721.2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1721 OF 2014
Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited
versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-9,Pune and another
Petitioner
Respondents
Mr.Mihir C. Naniwadekar for Petitioner.Mr.Tejweer Singh for Respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND M.S.SANKLECHA, J.
PC :
DATE : 20 February 2014
1.In response to a notice issued to the Petitioner under Section 148 o the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 28 March 2013 and the reasons disclosed under a letter dated 21 October 2013, the Petitioner submitted objections for reopening of the assessment on 23 November 2013. In terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer {2003(259)-ITR-9}, we direct the Assessing Officer to dispose of the objections by a reasoned order within a period of four weeks from today. Until then, no steps shall be taken in pursuance of the notice dated 28 March 2013 and in the event that an adverse order is passed, for a further period of four weeks thereafter. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
2 of 2 WP.1721.2014
2.Liberty to challenge the notice dated 28 March 2013 in future, in case it becomes necessary for the Petitioner to do so.
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
MST
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.