Case LawHigh Court › Kirthana Udayanrepresented By Her Power...

Kirthana Udayanrepresented By Her Power Agent,Kutty Padmini v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward – 20(5),Chennai – 600 034

High Court 28 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Kirthana Udayanrepresented By Her Power Agent,Kutty Padmini v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward – 20(5),Chennai – 600 034
Date of order
28 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Kirthana Udayanrepresented By Her Power Agent,Kutty Padmini v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward – 20(5),Chennai – 600 034, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:28.03.2019 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.9324 of 2019and Kirthana Udayanrepresented by her Power Agent,Kutty Padmini.. Petitioner vs The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward – 20(5),Chennai – 600 034...Respondent PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ ofCertiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of theRespondent contained in its order dated 12.03.2019, forPAN:AFYPK0715R, in respect of Assessment Year 2016-17, and quashthe same together with all resultant notices issued, includingthe notice issued under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961, bearing reference no: NCW-20(5)/PAN: , forAssessment Year 2018-19, dated 21.03.2019, as arbitrary, unjustand illegal and to consequently, direct the Respondent or any oftheir subordinates, agents, representatives or any other personclaiming under/through the Respondents to refrain from in anymanner seeking to enforce and/or initiate recovery proceedingspursuant to the Notice of Demand bearing No.ITBA/AST/S/156/2018-19/1014402338(1), dated 19.12.2018 issued by the Respondent, forPAN:AFYPK0715R in respect of Assessment Year 2016-17. Under instructions, Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned counsel forthe respondent fairly states that the impugned demand as per theorder of assessment dated 19.12.2018 of a sum of Rs.66,99,843/-,stands reduced to a sum of Rs.30,80,403/- after taking into https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ account the application under Section 154 filed by thepetitioner on 22.01.2019. The impugned order calls upon thepetitioner to pay 20% of the taxes, amounting now to a sum ofRs.6,17,000/-. Upon remittance of the aforesaid sum ofRs.6,17,000/-, the bank attachments under Section 226 (3) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 will stand lifted forthwith. The writpetition is disposed of in the above terms. Consequently,connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar skaToThe Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward – 20(5),Chennai – 600 034.+1 cc to Mr.Arun Karthik Mohan, Advocate, S.R.No.30064+1 cc to Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, Advocate, S.R.No.30304 W.P.No.9324 of 2019andW.M.P.Nos.9906, 9907, 9912, 9913 & 9914 of 2019SSM(29/03/2019).
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan