Kisan Agro Mart Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward No. (2)Jalgaon And Others
High Court
12 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Kisan Agro Mart Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward No. (2)Jalgaon And Others
Date of order
12 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Kisan Agro Mart Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward No. (2)Jalgaon And Others, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 wp 13955.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 13955 OF 2018
Kisan Agro Mart Pvt. Ltd. Through its Authorized DirectorAnil Radhakishan Shukla.. Petitioner
Versus
The Income Tax Officer Ward No. (2)Jalgaon and others
.. Respondents
Shri Chandak Raviraj R., Advocate for the Petitioner.Shri Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.Shri Sanjiv B. Deshpande, A.S.G. for the Respondent No. 3.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA ANDA. M. DHAVALE, JJ. DATE : 12TH MARCH, 2019.
FINAL ORDER :
.Mr. Chandak, the learned advocate for the petitionerassails the rejection of it's objection to the notice for reopeningthe assessment.
2.Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and2 submits that, the assessment has been concluded and thepetitioner has challenged the said assessment by filing an appealbefore the Commissioner Appeals on 17.01.2019.
2 wp 13955.18
3.Mr. Chandak, the learned counsel refers to the judgment ofthe Apex Court in a case of Jeans Knit Pvt. Ltd. Vs.Deputy Commissioner of Income reported in (2017) 390ITR (S.C.), so also the judgment of this Court in a case ofBharat Jayantilal Patel Vs. Union of India and othersreported in ITR 2015 (378)-596 (Bom) and the judgment of theApex Court in a case of Calcata Discount Co. Ltd. Vs.Income Tax Officer reported in (1961) 41ITR 191 (SC).
2.In all these judgments referred to above, the party had notavailed the remedy of appeal and had challenged the order in apetition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3.In the present case, the petitioner has already availedremedy of appeal by filing substantive appeal beforeCommissioner Appeals challenging the assessment order. Thepetitioner can raise all the grounds as raised in the presentpetition in the substantive appeal filed.
4.In view of the above, we are not inclined to entertain thepresent writ petition. The writ petition accordingly standsdisposed of. No costs.
[A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]bsb/March 19
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.