Kishan Lal Agarwal, Karta Of H.u.f v. Hanuman Sahai Saini
High Court
27 May 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Kishan Lal Agarwal, Karta Of H.u.f v. Hanuman Sahai Saini
Date of order
27 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Kishan Lal Agarwal, Karta Of H.u.f v. Hanuman Sahai Saini, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 159/2025
Kishan Lal Agarwal, Karta Of H.u.f., Aged About 71 Years, S/o Lt.Sh. Swaroop Narayan, R/o Mahaveer Marg, Behind ChaudharyHotel, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Hanuman Sahai Saini, S/o Lt. Sh. Ishwar Lal, R/o Plot No.39, Income Tax Colony, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Raj-DeceasedDuring Suit.39, Income Tax Colony, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Raj-DeceasedDuring Suit.
2. Amar Saini S/o Sh. Omprakash Saini, Aged About 41Years, R/o Plot No. E 120A, Kataria Colony, RamnagarExtension, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj.).Years, R/o Plot No. E 120A, Kataria Colony, RamnagarExtension, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. Kailash Chandra, S/o Sh Banwar Lal Sharma, ThroughJawahar Restaurant, Mirza Ismail Road. R/o Civil LinesJaipur Deceased.Jawahar Restaurant, Mirza Ismail Road. R/o Civil LinesJaipur Deceased.
4. Smt. Dhankawarm, W/o Lt. Sh. Kailash, Chandra Sharma.5. Neeraj S/o Lt. Sh. Kailash, Chandra Sharma5. Neeraj S/o Lt. Sh. Kailash, Chandra Sharma
6. Dheeraj S/o Lt. Sh., Kailash Chandra Sharma
7. Smt. Antima, W/o Sh. Vinay And D/o Lt. Sh. KailashChandra Sharma, Resident Of House No. 65, MohanNagar, Swage Farm, Jaipur.Chandra Sharma, Resident Of House No. 65, MohanNagar, Swage Farm, Jaipur.
8. Krishna Kumar S/o Sh. Bhanwar Lal Sharma, ThroughJawahar Restaurant, Mirza Ismail Road, R/o Civil LinesJaipur (Deceased).Jawahar Restaurant, Mirza Ismail Road, R/o Civil LinesJaipur (Deceased).
9. Smt. Bhjagwati Devi W/o Lt. Sh. Krishna Kumar Sharma,Resident Of House No. A 33, Sohan Nagar, EngineeringColony, Near The Well, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan.Resident Of House No. A 33, Sohan Nagar, EngineeringColony, Near The Well, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan.
10. Rajesh Sharma S/o Lt. Sh. Krishna Kumar Sharma,Resident Of House No. A 33, Sohan Nagar, EngineeringColony, Near The Well, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan.Resident Of House No. A 33, Sohan Nagar, EngineeringColony, Near The Well, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan.
11. Rakesh Sharma S/o Lt. Sh. Krishna Kumar Sharma, R/oC-7A, In Lane Opposite To The Hanuman Temple, SundarVihar, Swage Farm, Sodala, Jaipur, Rajasthan.C-7A, In Lane Opposite To The Hanuman Temple, SundarVihar, Swage Farm, Sodala, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
12. Smt. Baby W/o Sh. Pawan And D/o Lt. Sh., Krishna
Kumar Sharma.
13. Smt. Suman W/o Sh. Prahlad And D/o Lt. Sh. KrishnaKumar Sharma, Resident Of Plot No. 28, Mahadev Nagar,Nandpuri Hawa Sadak, Jaipur, Rajasthan And A 33, SohanNagar, Engineering Colony, Near The Well, New SanganerRoad, Jaipur, Rajasthan.Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Plot No. 28, Mahadev Nagar,Nandpuri Hawa Sadak, Jaipur, Rajasthan And A 33, SohanNagar, Engineering Colony, Near The Well, New SanganerRoad, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order
27/05/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at somelength, upon instructions of his client, seeks permission towithdraw the present revision petition.
Permission sought for is granted.
Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
DEEPA RANI -98
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.