Kishana Medatwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Jaipur
High Court
12 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Kishana Medatwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Jaipur
Date of order
12 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kishana Medatwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Jaipur, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having renderedinfructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6251/2022
Kishana Medatwal W/o Suresh Medatwal, Aged About 59 Years,Resident Of 1056 Jhalaniyo Ka Rasta Kishanpole Bazar Jaipur302001 Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Jaipur Having Its AddressAt New Central Revenue Building Bhagwan Dass Road,Jaipur Rajasthan, 302005At New Central Revenue Building Bhagwan Dass Road,Jaipur Rajasthan, 302005
2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Ministry Of Finance, HavingIts Address At North Block, New Delhi-110011 ThroughIts Address At North Block, New Delhi-110011 Through
Its Chairman
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Prateek Kedawat
For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
12/09/2024
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submitthat in view of subsequent events, the petition has now renderedinfructuous.
2.Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having renderedinfructuous.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
Kamlesh Kumar-RAHUL/7
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue