Kishin Shewaram Loungani v. Income Tax Officer Ward-23(2)(6),Mumbai & Ors
High Court
10 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Kishin Shewaram Loungani v. Income Tax Officer Ward-23(2)(6),Mumbai & Ors
Date of order
10 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kishin Shewaram Loungani v. Income Tax Officer Ward-23(2)(6),Mumbai & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: In case any re-assessment orders are passed, thesame also will stand quashed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1/4 914-WP-1166-2023 & Ors.doc
Rupani Intercom Pvt. Ltd.
VersusIncome Tax Officer Ward-14(3)(1), Mumbai & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
AND
(917) WRIT PETITION NO. 3581 OF 2022
Kishin Shewaram Loungani
Versus
Income Tax Officer Ward-23(2)(6),Mumbai & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
AND
(918) WRIT PETITION NO. 256 OF 2023
Celestial Aviation Funding Unlimited
Company
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,International Tax, Circle 2(3)(2) & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
AND
(919) WRIT PETITION NO. 2189 OF 2023
Sodexo India Service Private Limited
Versus
ACIT, Mumbai & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
AND
(920) WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 5792 OF 2023
Indira Suresh Agrawal
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward12(2)(1) & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
AND
(929) WRIT PETITION NO. 71 OF 2024
Roche Products (India) Private Limited
...Petitioner
VersusAssistant Commissioner of Income TaxInternational Tax, Circle 1(3)(1),Mumbai & Anr.
...Respondents
AND
(932) WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 5981 OF 2024
Saira Banu Khan
VersusAssistant Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle 4(1) & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(922) WRIT PETITION NO. 6452 OF 2023
Kishore Haresh Ramchandan
VersusIncome Tax Officer Ward 2(2) & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
AND
(926) WRIT PETITION NO. 15251 OF 2023
Rohini Anil Pandhe
Versusthe Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
----
WP/1166/2023 Ms. Dinkle Hariya, Advocate for Petitioner.
Ms. Swapna Gokhale for Respondents-Revenue.
WP/3581/2022
Mr. Jas Sanghavi and Mr. Yash Prakash and Ms Vikas Poojary i/b PDS Legal for the Petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents-Revenue.
WP/256/2023 Ms. Fereshte Sethna and Mr. Mrunal Parekh i/b DMD Advocates forPetitioner.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
3/4 914-WP-1166-2023 & Ors.doc
WP/2189/2023
Mr. Mrunal Parekh i/b DMD Advocates for Petitioner.Mr. Devvrat Singh for Respondents-Revenue.
WPL/5792/2023
Ms. Anjali Trivedi i/b V Thakers Advocates for Petitioner. Mr. Subir Kumar a/w Mr. Abhinav Palsikar for Respondents-Revenue.
WP/6452/2023Mr. Dharan Gandhi for Petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents-Revenue.
WP/15251/2023
Ms. Dinkle Hariya i/b Ms. Rashmi Vyas for Petitioner.
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents-Revenue.
WP/71/2024
Ms. Fereshte Sethna a/w Mr. Mrunal Parekh i/b DMD Advocates forPetitionerMr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
WPL/5981/2024
Mr. Dharan V. Gandhi for Petitioner.
Mr. N. C. Ranganayakulu for Respondents-Revenue.
----CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATED : 10[th] MAY 2024
P.C. :
1All these petitions relate to different Assessment Years. We areinformed by counsel for Petitioners that these Petitions will be covered by
the judgment of this court in Hexaware Technologies Limited v. Assistant
Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 15(1)(2) Mumbai and Ors.[1 ]Counsel for
Respondents concur.
3Therefore, the notices and orders impugned in these petitions arequashed and set aside. In case any re-assessment orders are passed, thesame also will stand quashed. So also, consequential demand notices orpenalty notices will also stand quashed and set aside.
4Petitions disposed accordingly.
5.Whichever contention raised in the Petitions not covered by theHexaware Technologies (Supra) is kept open to be raised, should the needarise.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.