K.k.denesan v. Ramkumar, Jj
High Court
30 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
K.k.denesan v. Ramkumar, Jj
Date of order
30 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In K.k.denesan v. Ramkumar, Jj, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
MONDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2009 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1931
ITA.No. 98 of 2008()
--------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30/01/2004 IN ITA.446/COCH/2002
of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT:
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS. MR.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
MR.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT:
---------------------------------------------------
EDAMON VANITHA SOCIETY, EDAMON.P.O.,
PUNALUR.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 30/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I.T.A. NO: 98 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 30[th] March, 2009.
JUDGMENT
RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
Since the issue stands decided in connected case of the verysame assessee in ITA 134/2008, this appeal is also allowedfollowing the said judgment by reversing the order of the Tribunaland that of the First Appellate Authority and by restoring theassessment.
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
K. SURENDRA MOHANJudge
jj
K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.
----------------------------------------------------
M.F.A.NO:
-----------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Dated:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.