K.k.denesan v. Ramkumar, Jj
High Court
26 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
K.k.denesan v. Ramkumar, Jj
Date of order
26 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In K.k.denesan v. Ramkumar, Jj, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: We therefore dismiss the writ petition asinfructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
THURSDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2009 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1931
WP(C).No. 15931 of 2004(V)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------
M/S. SWISS TIME & ELECTRONICS,
XL/1831, WAKF BUILDING, BROAD WAY,
ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND (A.201)
SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
---------------
1. THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE I, TRIVANDRUM.
2. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE I, THARAKANDOM CENTRE,
BANERJI ROAD, COCHIN-18.
ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SENIOR ADVOCATE
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 26/3/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W.P(C) NO: 15931 OF 2004 V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 26[th ]Mach , 2009.
JUDGMENT
RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
In view of the judgment in I.T. Appeals 29/2004 and30/2008, this matter has become infructuous and counsel for thepetitioner confirms it. We therefore dismiss the writ petition asinfructuous.
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
K. SURENDRA MOHANJudge
jj
K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.
----------------------------------------------------
M.F.A.NO:
-----------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Dated:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.