Case LawHigh Court › K.krishnamurthy v. The Commissioner Of I...

K.krishnamurthy v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Cuddalore

High Court 14 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
K.krishnamurthy v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Cuddalore
Date of order
14 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In K.krishnamurthy v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Cuddalore, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel files acounter today on behalf of the second respondent wherein, atparagraph No.4, he states that the appeal filed by thepetitioner in I.T.A.No.06/IT(A)-PDY/2013-14 has been decided infavour of the petitioner by order of the Commissioner of Income Tax...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Writ Petition No.877 of 2006andWPMP No.1018 of 2006 K.Krishnamurthy ...PetitionerVs 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Cuddalore. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle II, Cuddalore. ... Respondents Prayer: PETITION filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, callingfor the records on the file of the Second Respondent relating tothe impugned order dated 05.05.2005 in PAN: , GIRNo:21712 K and the Second Respondent relating to the impugnedorder dated 28.12.2005 in PAN: , GIR No:K-21712 andquash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sai Krishnan for M/s.Sai, Bharathjk & Ilan For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing counsel--------------- This Writ Petition has been filed challenging recoveryproceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer, the 2[nd]respondent in terms of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) pending anappeal filed by the petitioner before the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals), arrayed as first respondent before me. 2. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel files acounter today on behalf of the second respondent wherein, atparagraph No.4, he states that the appeal filed by thepetitioner in I.T.A.No.06/IT(A)-PDY/2013-14 has been decided infavour of the petitioner by order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 06.05.2016 and all additions made in theorder of assessment stand deleted. 3. Thus nothing further survives in this Writ Petition andthe same is closed recording the aforesaid. No costs.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Insp cell) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar slTo1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Cuddalore.2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle II, Cuddalore.+1cc to M/s.Sai, Bharathjk & Ilan, Advocate SR.85789+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate SR.86125Writ Petition No.877 of 2006and WPMP No.1018 of 2006PVS(CO)CB(19/11/2019) 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan