Case LawHigh Court › Knowlarity Communications India Private...

Knowlarity Communications India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner

High Court 03 Jul 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Knowlarity Communications India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner
Date of order
03 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Knowlarity Communications India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3724/2020 KNOWLARITY COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Madan with Mr. Amol Sinha, Mr. Nitin Gulati, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Advocates versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R% 03.07.2020 The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondent to grant refund for Assessment Year 2018-19 of Rs.1,39,59,190/- along with interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In the present petition, it was averred that the action of the respondent in not granting refund was arbitrary, unreasonable and unjustified. It was further averred that even though the petitioner’s case had been selected for scrutiny assessment under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, yet the department was obliged in law to release the refund amount claimed by the assessee pending completion of scrutiny assessment. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for respondents had stated that a proposal under Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 had been mooted by the Assessing Officer. He was directed to produce the said proposal before this Court. Learned counsel for respondents-revenue has filed an affidavit dated 02[nd] July, 2020 annexing the order dated 29[th] June, 2020 passed under Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In view of the aforesaid order, learned counsel for petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to challenge the order dated 29[th] June, 2020 passed under Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition stands disposed of. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail. MANMOHAN, J JULY 03, 2020 rn SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan