Knowlarity Communications India Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle 14(2), New Delhi
High Court
21 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Knowlarity Communications India Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle 14(2), New Delhi
Date of order
21 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Knowlarity Communications India Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle 14(2), New Delhi, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~9
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8445/2018
KNOWLARITY COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. Nitin Gulati, Advocate Advocate
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 14(2), NEW DELHI
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel, Revenue.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R 21.08.2018
%
It is stated by learned standing counsel for the Revenue, upon instructions, that the assessee’s grievance with regard to the refund of his claim is being redressed. According to the instructions received, through email dated 16.08.2018 from the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, the concerned Assessing Officer (AO) had approved the assessee’s refund and generated the code and the process has been completed by the CPC. The respondent shall ensure that the orders are made within two weeks and the amount is remitted to the account of the assessee. The respondent shall also ensure to intimate the
appellant about credit of his account by appropriately coordinating
with CPC Bangalore.
In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of.
Dasti.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
AUGUST 21, 2018 pkb
ANU MALHOTRA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.