Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Known As Epcos India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy...

Known As Epcos India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 11(1), Kol. & Anr

High Court 12 Dec 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Known As Epcos India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 11(1), Kol. & Anr
Date of order
12 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Known As Epcos India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 11(1), Kol. & Anr, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

12.12.2023PBSl. No.9. WPA 26093 of 2023 M/s. TDK India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Known as EPCOS India Pvt. Ltd.) VsDeputy Commissioner of IncomeTax, Circle – 11(1), Kol. & Anr. Mr. Suryaneel Das. … For the Petitioner.Mr. Prithu Dudharia.…….for the respondent. Heard learned advocates appearing for theparties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challengedthe impugned assessment order and demand dated18[th] April, 2022, along with intimation letter dated 17[th]January, 2023, on the ground that the same are notsustainable in law since neither the impugned demandnotice nor the impugned assessment order andintimation contains Document Identification Number(DIN) which is contrary to the Circular No.19/2019dated 14[th] August, 2019, issued by the CBDT andpetitioner further challenges the aforesaidorder/demand notice/intimation on the ground thatthe same have been issued by the JurisdictionalOfficer instead of National Faceless Assessment Centre(NFAC) under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act,1961. Mr. Dudharia, learned advocate appearing forthe respondent income tax authority submits that inthe intimation letter dated 17[th] January, 2023contains DIN, but from the order under Section 143(3)of the Act dated 18[th] April, 2022 and the demandnotice he could not show that DIN was quoted andthat the same was quoted within the statutory period. Considering the facts and circumstances of thecase and submission of the parties, I am of theconsidered view that the aforesaid impugnedassessment order and demand notice dated 18[th] April,2022 along with intimation letter dated 17[th] January,2023 which have been issued by the JurisdictionalOfficer without quoting the DIN are not sustainable inlaw and the same are quashed with liberty to theincome tax authority concerned to pass freshassessment order by following due procedure of lawwithin three months from the date of communicationof this order by proceeding from the stage whereprocedural irregularities have been committed. With this observation and direction, this writpetition being WPA 26093 of 2023 is disposed of. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… Get help with an income-tax notice β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan