Case LawHigh Court › K.n.subramaniam v. The Principal Commiss...

K.n.subramaniam v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 03 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
K.n.subramaniam v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In K.n.subramaniam v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the circumstances, we have no option but to quash the order passed by respondent No.2 on 16.02.2023.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.07.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.A.No.862 of 2025 & C.M.P.Nos.7285 & 7287 of 2025 K.N.Subramaniam..Appellant Vs. 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Department No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034. 2. The Tax Recovery Officer III Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Department No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034. 3. The District Registrar Corporation Marriage Hall Syrian Church Road Puthiyavan Nagar, Sukrawar Pettai R.S.Puram, Coimbatore 641 001. 4. Sameer Bhuvaneshwari .. Respondents __________ Page 1 of 7 Prayer : Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 15.02.2024 in W.P.No.5336 of 2023. For Appellant :Ms.AL.GanthimathiSenior CounselFor Mr.L.PalanimuthuSenior CounselFor Mr.L.Palanimuthu For Respondents :Mrs.S.PremalathaJunior Standing Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2Junior Standing Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2 Ms.Sameer BhuvaneswariParty-in-Person[Respondent 4] JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This appeal impugns an order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 15.02.2024, by which, the petition came to be dismissed with liberty to file a suit in accordance with law. Petitioner, who is appellant herein, had sought quashing of the order dated 16.02.2023 passed by respondent No.2. 2. The facts in brief are that appellant had purchased a property from respondent No.4 vide an agreement dated 24.02.2012. On 25.05.2012, an __________ Page 2 of 7 No.2. W.A.No.862 of 2025 order of attachment of the said property came to be passed by respondent No.2. 3. Sometime in April, 2015, respondent No.4 filed a criminal complaint against appellant alleging that she had not sold the property to appellant and appellant had got the property registered in his name based on forged documents. The matter was carried right up to Apex Court and the Apex Court stated that it was a civil dispute and respondent No.4 should pursue civil remedies. We are informed respondent No.4 has not filed a suit till date. 4. In the meanwhile, respondent No.2 proceeded ahead in furtherance of the order of attachment dated 25.05.2012 and after receiving objections and submissions from appellant and respondent No.4, passed the order-in-original dated 16.02.2023. The conclusion at paragraph 41 reads as under: “41. Conclusion – When the vendor has not received the sale consideration as claimed by the objector, the execution of registration of sale deed by the then SRO, Annur is illegitimate and unlawful and therefore the registration authorities are directed to cancel the same is restore title and ownership over the said asset to the Assessee in default and in-turn confirm the attachment of the impugned asset by the income-tax department __________ Page 3 of 7 for the purpose of recovery of tax dues from the Assessee in default. Schedule of the Asset confirmed for attachment All that piece and parcel of land and building situate at Central theatre/Shree Astalakshmi theatre along with Plant and Machinery with 64 Cent land appurtenant to the building thereof at S.F. No.339/6, Annur Village, Avinashi Taluk, Coimbatore. Registered in the Annur Sub-Registrar Office in Document No.3609/2007 and 3608/2007. This order is passed as per directions of the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature of Madras in W.P.No.20953 of 2019 and WMP No.20137 of 2019 dated 14.10.2022.” 5. Petition referred in paragraph 41 quoted above is a petition that appellant herein had filed challenging the notice issued by respondent No.2 where the Court was pleased to direct appellant to appear before respondent No.2 and answer the notice. All that piece and parcel of land and building situate at Central theatre/Shree Astalakshmi theatre along with Plant and Machinery with 64 Cent land appurtenant to the building thereof at S.F. No.339/6, Annur Village, Avinashi Taluk, Coimbatore. Registered in the Annur Sub-Registrar Office in Document No.3609/2007 and 3608/2007. This order is passed as per directions of the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature of Madras in W.P.No.20953 of 2019 and WMP No.20137 of 2019 dated 14.10.2022.” 5. Petition referred in paragraph 41 quoted above is a petition that appellant herein had filed challenging the notice issued by respondent No.2 where the Court was pleased to direct appellant to appear before respondent No.2 and answer the notice. 6. Having considered the order passed by respondent No.2, when we observed that respondent No.2 has proceeded as if he was conducting trial in a civil suit and asked counsel under what provision of law was respondent No.2 empowered to order cancellation of a sale deed between two parties, counsel stated there is no such provision. __________ Page 4 of 7 7. In the circumstances, we have no option but to quash the order passed by respondent No.2 on 16.02.2023. 8. Certainly, the rights of the Department are kept open to proceed against the assessee in default. We express no opinion. All rights and contentions of the parties are kept open. 9. Appeal is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, all the interim applications are closed. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J.) 03.07.2025 Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/No kpl __________ Page 5 of 7 To 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Department No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034. Income Tax Department No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034. 2. The Tax Recovery Officer III Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Department No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034. Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Department No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034. 3. The District Registrar Corporation Marriage Hall Syrian Church Road Puthiyavan Nagar, Sukrawar Pettai R.S.Puram, Coimbatore 641 001. Syrian Church Road Puthiyavan Nagar, Sukrawar Pettai R.S.Puram, Coimbatore 641 001. __________Page 6 of 7 __________Page 7 of 7 W.A.No.862 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND SUNDER MOHAN,J. (kpl) W.A.No.862 of 2025 03.07.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan