Kodak India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
08 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Kodak India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
08 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Kodak India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byBalajiBalaji G.PanchalG.Date:Panchal2021.03.0911:47:16+0530
(16)-ITXA-682-15.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.682 OF 2015
Kodak India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Sham Walve h/f Mr. A. R. Malhotra, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 8[th] MARCH, 2021
P.C.
Heard Mr. Atul Jasani, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. Sham Walve holding for Mr. A. R. Malhotra, learned counsel for therespondent.
2. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantunder section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated20.06.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” Bench,Mumbai in ITA No.2790/Mum/2010 for the assessment year 2006-07.
3. The appeal was admitted by this Court by order dated07.11.2014 on the substantial questions of law framed in the said order.
4. Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed by learnedcounsel for the appellant.
1 of 2
(16)-ITXA-682-15.doc.
5. It is stated that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivad seVishwas Act, 2020 providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes. Interms thereof, appellant has filed declaration under section 3 on 31.12.2020before the designated authority. Designated authority has issued certificateunder section 5(1) on 01.03.2021 determining the amount refundable. Forpassing of the final order under section 5(2), appellant is required towithdraw the appeal under section 4(3) and to furnish proof of withdrawalalong with intimation of payment, if any, to the designated authority.Hence, prayer for withdrawal of the appeal.
6. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to theprayer made.
7. Having regard to the above, we allow withdrawal of the appeal.
8. Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
9. Refund as per rules.
MILIND N. JADHAV, J
UJJAL BHUYAN, J
2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.