Case LawHigh Court › Kokilaben A Shah v. The Income-Tax Offic...

Kokilaben A Shah v. The Income-Tax Officer

High Court 23 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Kokilaben A Shah v. The Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Kokilaben A Shah v. The Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 782 of 2008 ================================================================ KOKILABEN A SHAH Versus THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, ================================================================ Appearance:MR MANISH J SHAH(1320) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Opponent(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDIand HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI Date : 23/08/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI) Learned Advocate for the appellant seeks permission towithdraw the present Appeal as the appellant has alreadyapproached the concerned authority under Section 4 of theDirect Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Permission as prayed for is granted. The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (BELA M. TRIVEDI, J) CAROLINE Sd/- (A. C. JOSHI, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan