In Konark Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9 (2) And Anr.…, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The Review Petition is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONREVIEW PETITION NO.7 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1349 OF 2015
Konark Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
… Petitioner
Vs.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – 9 (2) and Anr.… Respondents
Mr. Naresh Jain a/w Mr. Sumit Raghani a/w Ms. Neha Achlia i/by Agrud Partners for the Petitioner (Orig. Appellant).
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.DATE : 5[th] APRIL, 2018
A.K. MENON, JJ.
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. There is no error apparent on the face of the record, even otherwise there is no ground for review. The Review Petition is rejected.
(A.K. MENON, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue